SASQUATCH VERSUS SASQUATCH

There is a method to this madness.  If you check some of the past blogs you will find charges that NASA has been tampering with evidence.  The national agency has purposefully altered many images, either deleting material from photographs or adding material.  It is quite insidious and dangerous.  It is a way to keep the public ignorant and to discount any true discoveries that are made which NASA does not think you should know.  And the sasquatch fiasco they created is another, and even more serious, piece of evidence against them because now there is an alternative source which they must face:   a photo of what may be a true sasquatch like being which they did not know really existed.



Two possible sasquatch like beings strolling together

The above image if seen without any other hype by NASA beforehand would be easier to accept as real (which it is).  But in 2014, NASA released the following image of its version of a sasquatch to the world and waited while everyone pondered its potential.



NASA version of Martian sasquatch

Looks too good to be true, doesn't it!  Notice the amazing, astounding detail!  Yep, that sure must really be a sasquatch like being on Mars.  Was it not nice of NASA to actually let us see it?  To even promote it?  Yes, this is sarcasm.

And then, sometime later, NASA "realized" that in reality this was only a pile of oddly shaped rocks.  In fact, this image doesn't even really exist.  It is an image created by someone at NASA to appear to be a sasquatch.  How do I know?  Because of the telltale signs of tampering that NASA has not yet learned how to completely cover up.



Arrows point to "halo" around back of image

Notice the fuzzy type of "halo" at which the arrows are pointing?  It is difficult to see, but it is there.  It is reminiscent of the following NASA "doctored" images. 



Note the obvious signs of tampering

Red arrows point to where the image was inserted into the photograph.  What makes this even worse is that NASA inserted this image into more than one crater bottom! 

And of course also on the moon there is crater Lamb.  Here, material of alien nature was removed by NASA.

So, what does all of this mean?  It means that when people look at the following picture and are asked to believe that it is genuine...they probably won't.



Real sasquatch like creatures?

Why not believe this is a genuine image of two sasquatch like creatures?  Because NASA has already released its own even sharper version of sasquatch and it proved to be only a bunch of rocks.  So why should anyone believe that this image is anything but a bunch of rocks?  Thus it is discounted as being genuine based on NASA's tactic of spreading disinformation and its data purging of the past.

 This is NASA's goal.  Keep the real information from the public because they don't need to know it and make sure everything else looks like a hoax or a bunch of rocks after raising the hopes of true discovery.  Just another dead end - that's what NASA wants you to think.  They have learned that this is a very difficult strategy for someone to overcome.  It's even better than deleting data from the record.  Now they can let the public see what it wants and then "scientifically" refute it.

How to fight this type of strategy?  It's important for the public to monitor the activities of NASA.  How?  One way is to be aware that NASA uses surrogates to do its dirty work.  Note that whenever a new anomaly is supposedly found on Mars, or elsewhere, the person who made the find is never identified by NASA by name.  The discoverer is called a anomaly hunter or something like that.  This almost immediately marks it as a fake produced by NASA.

Whenever a true anomaly is discovered it is usually reported by press release and when this is done a name must always be associated with the release; the identity of the researcher who made the discovery.  We want our names associated with our finds.  It is common practice.  Also, we can be held accountable.  We own the discovery; and if we made a mistake our name is associated with it.  That is how true reporting of a discovery of an anomaly is properly handled.  Not the NASA way.

When NASA attributes its phony finds to some unnamed anomaly hunter just replace that word with NASA propaganda.

Unfortunately, because of NASA's shady tactics, when a Martian woman is truly located on Mars most of the public will fail to believe it because of photographs produced by NASA like the one below.

I am Dylan Clearfield and I vouch for the contents of  the book,  Chaos on Mars