CHASING THE SASQUATCH ON MARS

The continued chase for the Sasquatch on Mars.  Other images of the area in which the supposed Sasquatch was photographed were sought but could not be found. Examined were the available images for the Northern Plains and I could not find anything similar from present or past.  In fact, of significant importance is that I could not even find the original photograph of the Sasquatch on Mars.  It is already gone.  Deleted by NASA.

Original picture of  Sasquatch

This did not surprise me.  That is the tactic that NASA uses.  It is vital to understand this strategy.  NASA releases a huge amount of data (in this case over 48,000 images, almost 2000 pages worth) one day without announcement.  Researchers such as myself have about 24 hours to examine the images.  It is a daunting task.  For example, it takes about one hour to examine 10 pages.  How long would it take to examine 2000 of them?  Anyway, what NASA does is delete the anomalous images that people such as myself find and then publish to the world.  That is why as soon as NASA released the images I dove into inspecting as many of them as I could.


 The above Sasquatch image is no longer available in the NASA catalog.  What does that imply?  I believe NASA uses people like myself in order to find the anomalous images for them so they in turn can then delete them, thus denying the images to the rest of the public.  By the way, we all have paid for these images and have a right to see them, even NASA admits that. But that is why we are allowed that first 24 hour glimpse.  We had our chance to see the images now NASA will decide what to do with them.

Now - to the Sasquatch image itself.  Why do I believe the image of concern might be a Sasquatch?  I use probability and coincidence as measuring guides.  First, how likely is it that features like those in the Sasquatch photo would be found in a complete desert environment?  Two big mounds of material?  Not likely, but not impossible.  But how likely is it that the object when magnified would have a humanoid appearance?  Not likely, but not impossible.

However, when you examine the object, feature by feature, the sense of the coincidence no longer is so strong.  The probability factor that this is an image of a very strange being greatly increases.  For example:

Much enlarged image

What are the odds or probabilities that the part of the body that the number 1 is pointing at would look like a head?  Just a coincidence?  Doubtful.  What are the odds that the body part number 2 is pointing at would be an ankle and foot?  Not likely a coincidence.  Number 3 points toward what may be a hand at the side of the being.  And number 4 shows a bent knee and a leg in motion.  How likely is it that all of these features are pure coincidence? All of them in the same location!  it seems beyond the laws of probability.  Does it not?

Why is it so easy for people to believe there are snakes on Mars but so impossible to accept a Sasquatch like creature?  A creature that is probably silicon based and as such much more native to a world like Mars!

This is just one of many similar types of photographs I was able to rescue from the original NASA release of images that are now deleted from their files.     Chaos on Mars