WOMEN ON MARS?

As revealed in the last post, NASA is quite experienced at deleting information that the public might find interesting.  Particularly information about alien activity in our solar system.  But NASA sometimes provides more information than actually exists - creating images that are not really there.  I discovered this by surprise while poring through my thousands of photographs of the moon and being amazed by a picture that seemed to show a building in the center of a crater.  A building that was in sharp enough detail as to look like a church as one might see on earth.  But what was most shocking was that this was a LATER NASA photograph.  When I examined my original photo of the same location the only thing that was in the center of the crater was a massive, undefined mountainous outcrop!  It seems that NASA began manufacturing evidence at this point!  But why?  To add confusion.

Below are images of this amazing sight in the middle of Crater Planck.

                

The red arrows point to the signs of the crude attempts at photo shopping the image of a structure into the crater.  But there's even more to this deception.  I later found the same type of church like object to have been implanted into the bottom's of two more DIFFERENT craters!  Yes, the same object - different craters!

Why is this so important?  Because when studying the Moon and Mars the primary source of visual information is gotten from NASA.  If NASA is purposefully supplying false data - either subtracting objects from a picture or adding objects to a picture - this makes all evidence suspect.  There seems to be two ways to combat this.  One way is to be in possession of the original photographs, which in most cases had to have been begun decades ago.  Or, two, scour any modern NASA photos the day they are released so as to be able to obtain the true images which may be censored as soon as a 24 hour period after release.

It seems that NASA has decided that the best way to defuse any investigations into anomalies found on Mars is to provide them to the eager public.  And, after a period has passed, either delete the falsely supplied anomaly or else prove that in reality it was not real at all and just a fabrication of the photographic process.  This will spread disinformation and, as noted, make any discoveries of artifacts on Mars highly suspect.

That is why the picture of the supposed woman on Mars was highlighted in the original post.

Seems like a compelling photograph!  But did you also note the thin white line running across the image on the right side where two pieces of the photo were spliced together?  Not a very neat job of creating a picture, is it?  It is important to beware the more modern images from Mars.  Not all are what they seem.  And there's a purpose behind them.

But there are genuine photos of ancient cities, and highways, and even living beings upon the red planet.   Chaos on Mars