Most people are not aware of how much data NASA has deleted from the public file. How much we have been denied access to. How many photographs they have censored because too much information about alien activity was revealed.
This is particularly important for my work because I rely upon the early, uncensored photos to show and provide evidence that extra-terrestrials are active in our solar system. How do I do this? I have collected NASA photographs of outer space since the beginning of the Space Program. I began with the early Ranger flights to the Moon. In case you don't know, the Ranger program involved crash landing spacecraft on the moon, taking photographs of the surface and relaying them back to earth until the last moment before impact. Thus, I have a huge private collection of the earliest images from all of the space programs before they were edited and censored by NASA. I have the originals!
I am about to show what I believe is among the most damaging pieces of evidence which proves that NASA actively censors information from the photographs that the public - tax payers - have paid to see. What is to follow is an original picture of Lamb crater in which is shown three separate alien objects. These have been fully described in my earlier work Alien Threat from the Moon. The side by side image below reveals the true picture on the left and the altered picture on the right. They are both images of the Crater Lamb, but one of them has two black censor bars over where the alien objects used to be.
It is difficult to see the location in the center of the crater on the right where the black strip is, but it is there. At any rate, the interior of the crater has been blacked out to prevent the public from seeing what is really there. This process was commonly used on the Moon. Wipe out any evidence. On Mars, NASA seems to be following a different strategy after the tactic of denying data backfired: supply too much evidence. How does this serve their purpose? Disinformation! A very strong deterrent to open scientific study.
No comments:
Post a Comment